bar restored his membership to "good standing" while he was still on probation. He pled guilty to one count of making a false statement, and never went to jail. The first was Kevin Clinesmith, a FBI attorney accused of doctoring an email wrongly used to spy on the Trump campaign, foisting a fraud on the FISA court. To review, the special counsel brought three cases against relative Russiagate small fries. But such supporters ought to be despondent not solely due to Durham's doings, but due to the state of our ruling regime itself-the rot of which the special counsel, in both his failures and successes, intentionally and unintentionally exposed. His champions may feel the same, only lamenting rather than cheering that Team Durham couldn't indict that ham sandwich-considering the bit players he prosecuted-and that, moreover, the special counsel failed to pursue the biggest fish who so gravely betrayed our republican system from within the government itself.Ī sober analysis of the special counsel's performance- pending any final report-justifies Durham's supporters' despondency. With the unceremonious conclusion of Russiagate special counsel John Durham's third and likely final case against Steele dossier fabulist Igor Danchenko-the second in a row in which Durham failed to earn a conviction-many on the Left and some on the Right have declared his probe a dud.ĭurham's detractors crow that he couldn't indict a ham sandwich, and disingenuously use this point to drive the narrative there was no "there" there in arguably the greatest scandal in American history.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |